Clallam Count Motion for Summaryh Judgment or, in the alternative, to Dismiss Case No. 08-2-0033
Clallam County requested dismissal of Case No. 08-2-0033. Exhibit A to the attachment states that the County could negotiate acceptable language with DCC to replace the “prior to or as of July 1, 1990” language of County Ordinance and Resolution regarding zoning and development regulations. This has been the key issue of this case. County Commissioners have taken great latitude with interpretation of zoning and development regulations in the past and this is the entire reason for DCC petitions on these issues, particularly this Case No. 08-2-00033. Put plainly, the County double crossed the citizens in interpretation of County Ordinances and zoning regulations in regard to two previous DCC issues and the regulations need to be placed in CONCRETE language.CountyMotion,etc.pdf
(0) Comments • (0) Trackbacks •