The SEPA for Comprehensive Plan changes and changes to development regulations/zoning is contained in the following document. Public testimony is scheduled for May 6, 2009 before the Clallam County Planning Commission for these LAMIRD issues.
The SEPA notice and schedule for testimony is listed here CountyHearingNoticefor6May09.pdf
Posted by H_Oien on 04/24/09 at 07:26 AM
(0) Comments •
(2)
Trackbacks •
The Western Washington Growth Management Hearing Board will conduct a hearing regarding LAMIRD’s commencing at 10 am in the Sequim Transit Center on Tuesday April 28, 2009.
That notification is contained in this linkHearingCase08-2-0033.pdf
Posted by H_Oien on 04/24/09 at 07:16 AM
(0) Comments •
(0)
Trackbacks •
DCC presented a powerpoint of the Toxic Leachate of the Port Angeles dump which is creating a giant “dead zone” out into the Strait of Juan de Fuca MRCPresentationF1.pdf. A member of the MRC stated that finger pointing served no purpose. DCC stated that we have been informing Gov Gregoire, State DOE, Puget Sound Partnership, Clallam County, Port Angeles City C ouncil, and many other activities of the extent of the toxic “dead zone” which exists in the Strait of Juan de Fuca offshore of the dump. Most say there is a problem but no money to fix it. To this DCC replied that we feel responsible to inform local governmental entities of the problem and then proceed to higher levels of government for resolution. This is a major problem and needs correction for the health of our community and the waters of Washington State. We will persist.
Posted by H_Oien on 04/21/09 at 07:35 AM
(0) Comments •
(0)
Trackbacks •
The Clallam County Response Brief to the DCC Brief on the LAMIRD case is contained the the following CC_Rsp_Brief_Mtn_to_Stk_04.13.09.pdf
Posted by H_Oien on 04/13/09 at 07:20 PM
(0) Comments •
(1)
Trackbacks •
This is the DCC Brief for the current WWGMHB case relating to LAMIRD’s. The issues have been condensed down to the very significant issue relating to “uses, scale, size and intensity” of development on a site on July 1, 1997. This is a very important legal issue in-that Clallam County could invoke only one of those characteristics to justify a development in Laird’s East or West which had no semblance of a development that existed on July 1, 1997. DCC wants to make very specific definition of the interpretation of the Growth Management Act (GMA) language to prevent expansion of the size, use and scale of a new activity over and above that of the development which existed on July 1, 1997. The issue appears to be insignificant until you read the argument of this brief and realize how a new development could have no resemblance to what existed on July 1, 1997, yet be approved by the County. The brief is listed here DCCBriefMar09.pdf
Posted by H_Oien on 04/07/09 at 08:57 PM
(0) Comments •
(0)
Trackbacks •